Phillips Exeter Academy

Biohacks to learning anything faster

The world is now, more than ever, pulsating with information. Knowledge, one of the most powerful forms of currency, is free for the taking. However, the skill sets we need and the productive output required of us is also nothing like that of the previous generations. To keep up with the masses and even excel, we need to learn faster than ever before. The ability to learn faster is a mystery that many have attempted to crack. As we stand on the brink of a new era, the fusion of biology and technology gives great opportunities for accelerated acquisition of knowledge.

In order to optimize learning, an understanding of what learning is through a neurobiological lens would provide great insight. Any form of learning comes from the brain, more specifically, the strengthening or weakening of electrochemical signals between our neurons (a type of brain cell). The connections between neurons are known as synapses. And the changes in the strength of electrochemical signals between synapses is called synaptic plasticity.

Synaptic plasticity is the basis of learning and memory. Synaptic plasticity is a dynamic and adaptive process that allows the neural circuits in the brain to modify their activity in response to experience. When you are learning a new skill such as serving a volleyball, the neural pathways in your brain will fire and the shape of the neurons in your brain will change, allowing you to strengthen the signals sent to your brain when doing the right movement, and repetitions of the right movements eventually lead you to serve the ball consistently as there is a strong connection between the neurons that fire when you serve a ball.

Therefore, if we want to increase our learning abilities and learn faster, we should try to trigger a more plastic and malleable brain that will be willing to change its pathways in order to learn a new skill. Plasticity has been proven to be controlled by several chemicals in our brains, namely acetylcholine, epinephrine and dopamine. When those chemicals are released, the brain marks the event as “important” and “to edit” while most of the changes to the plasticity and shape of the connection between neurons happens during sleep. So how do we induce the release of acetylcholine, epinephrine and dopamine in large amounts while learning? Interestingly, the only condition needed to allow the brain to enter a plastic state is to make errors. Error provides a cue for frontal cortex networks to release those important learning chemicals. The more mistakes you make, the larger the dopamine release will be when you eventually do it right, hence making the brain more plastic and receptive for change and more prone to remember the right action/movement/answer.

Have you ever felt frustration every time you are struggling to learn a form of new knowledge but not getting it right consistently? Well, this happens due to the release of those important learning chemicals, which change the shape and plasticity of your brain. But the brain does not want to change its shape, hence the brain processes this large surge of chemicals as frustration. Every time you are failing to learn something and feeling frustrated, you are releasing chemicals that will make you succeed in learning this skill. In some ways, errors frame the brain to learn and absorb more information when you end up getting it right. The most efficient way to learn a skill fast is to maximize the amount of repetitions and fail as much as possible within a time period. Experiments have found that the brain will end up learning, figuring out and getting closer to the right answer if you have the intent of getting it right.

Another powerful tool is to react to this kind of frustration with happiness and pleasure. When we smile in the face of defeat, stress or struggle, we trick the brain to release dopamine (the neurotransmitter that guides pleasure and motivation but also helps in synaptic plasticity). Hence, we condition our brains to release dopamine when we are in the face of struggle and challenge. Next time you end up facing a challenge or having to learn something new, your brain will naturally release more dopamine and allow your brain to learn faster due to increased plasticity.

A third extremely important factor in learning is to allow your brain to absorb the information. After performing any intensive learning, whether it is studying for a test or learning to execute a backflip, taking a break of five to 10 minutes without engaging your brain with another form of stimulus allows the sequence of information learned to be replayed by your brain, which then selects the series of events in which there is a high release of neurotransmitters. The things you did well repeat and the things you did wrong get cut off, allowing you to acquire and process the information learned faster.

A fast-paced world, a fast-paced school and a fast-paced lifestyle push us to learn everything faster and to execute tasks at high efficiency. Fortunately, advances in our understanding of neuroscience allow us to develop behavioral ways to learn and absorb knowledge faster than the average person. Sometimes the difference between two very competent candidates with equal willingness to work is “talent”— an intangible that makes someone a faster learner and better performer. Well, why not try out these newly acquired “talents” of yours?

Goodbye with gratitude

Exeter Deconstructed: The Shakespeare Folios

With nearly 400,000 books in its collection, the Class of 1945 Library boasts a trove of literary treasures. But some books stand out.

The library is the grateful steward of two folios of William Shakespeare’s printed works: the second, which dates to 1632, and the fourth, which was published in 1685.

“The story of Shakespeare’s remarkable rise to global prominence begins with his promotion in the 17th century in a series of large, handsome folio volumes,” writes Lara Bovilsky, associate professor of English at the University of Oregon. “‘Folio’ was the name of the largest books in this period.  Due to their size, cost and careful printing, folios were the 17th century’s most prestigious format. They marked their author and contents as important.”

The second folio was printed 16 years after Shakespeare’s death. Of the roughly 1,000 copies of the second folio printed, about 200 are still known to exist. Exeter’s edition was a gift of the Rev. Rip Noble ’58, who told The Exeter Bulletin in 2008 that he was inspired to make his generous donation in gratitude to his Academy English teachers “who taught me to love and respect the English language.”

The folio had belonged to Noble’s grandmother. “My grandmother let me pick a book from her collection for every birthday and graduation,” Noble explained. Following Exeter, he went on to Princeton and to Union Theological Seminary. “I picked it when I graduated from seminary. I was thinking of Exeter and those teachers when I selected it.”

Editor’s note: This pieces was first published in the Summer 2024 issue of The Exeter Bulletin.

Teri and Duane Silvestri: Serving Exeter with pride

Lou who? How Kahn came to design the Academy library

Exeter Deconstructed: Eno bricks

Four alumni named to Trustees

Exeter leadership welcomes new members; terms commence in July.

Four alumni have recently joined Exeter’s Trustees, adding a wealth of professional experience and shared dedication to the Academy and its mission.

Sam Brown ’92, Gene Lynch ’79,  Genisha Saverimuthu ’02 and Rhoda Tamakloe ’01 officially begin their terms July 1.

Exeter is blessed to have a dedicated body of alumni volunteers, with diverse and expert backgrounds, to oversee the administration of the school and the management of its financial and physical resources. You can see all of our Trustees here.

Below please find below a short bio of each of our newest volunteers:

Independent study stokes seniors’ passion projects

Climate Action Day: Exeter gets hands dirty for planet

Day-long program turns 10, reminds Exonians about natural world and their place in it.

A rescue mission is underway in the Academy woods. Three hundred American chestnut saplings, dwarfs among towering pines and oaks, are fighting for a footing in our forest, and Exeter students are here for it.

An Exonian work party marched into the woods Monday to check on the mini chestnuts as one of 19 workshops and presentations comprising Exeter’s Climate Action Day. Now in its 10th year, the school-wide, day-long event is devoted to service projects and improving awareness of challenges to the environment, great and small. Workshops have ranged from environmental law to oyster farming to sustainable business practices, the program an important tenet of the school’s sustainability and climate action plan, “Building From Strength Toward a Carbon Zero Future,” published last spring.

Monday’s observance of Climate Action Day coincided with Earth Day, the global inspiration for what the Academy promotes locally. While planting saplings or turning over a community garden for spring seeding doesn’t track directly to disappearing ice caps, the underlying message is that human impact on our natural world has consequences. The institution is committed to ensuring students understand the principles of sustainability and the impacts of and potential solutions to climate change.

Keynote presenter Rev. Dr. Abby Mohaupt led an interactive workshop in Thompson Gym, challenging audience members to think about their purpose in life and how their actions affect the world around them, including the natural world. 

“What is nature?” posed the director of the Garrett Collective, prompting students to draw pictures of their interpretations of nature before asking, “Now, where do you fit in?”

Mohaupt admitted the task of fighting climate change is a tall one but referenced her work as a community organizer when urging students to start with small change and look inward for inspiration. “When we dig into our values we can make a difference in the world.”

‘A real and present danger’

The threat of nuclear war is “not some 1980s problem we read about in history books — it’s a real and present danger,” Dr. Ira Helfand ’67 told students in a workshop held in the Elting Room titled “Nuclear War, the Ultimate Climate Catastrophe.”

Helfand, a physician, is a member of the International Steering Group of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, a recipient of the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its work. As an ICAN representative, he has spoken to global audiences about the humanitarian impacts of nuclear war, including key United Nations assemblies that led to the successful negotiation of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in 2017. Helfand has served as an Exeter Trustee since 2020 and advised the school on the creation of its climate action plan.

Helfand spoke plainly to Exeter students about the devastation that would follow a potential nuclear attack, including massive, abrupt climate disruption, worldwide famine and the deaths of billions of people worldwide. He emphasized that the threat posed by nuclear war is higher than at previous times in history, thanks to a number of volatile global flashpoints including Russia’s war in Ukraine and tensions in the Middle East and South Asia. 

In addition, Helfand said, the climate crisis means that the world “isn’t getting safer, it’s getting more dangerous.” With many countries struggling to support their populations due to dwindling natural resources, more and more people are being displaced from their homes. This rising tide of climate-related migration increases the risk of conflict. 

Despite such a sobering message, Helfand remained hopeful about the possibility of avoiding nuclear war, if everyone — especially younger generations — do their part. He urged the students in the audience to begin by finding small, concrete ways to educate themselves further and increase the political will behind nuclear disarmament. “You had nothing to do with this problem … but the fact of the matter is that it’s your responsibility, too,” Helfand said. “You should really appreciate the power you have to influence policy.”

The little chestnut that could

The American chestnut, the “Redwood of the East,” once dominated forests from Maine to the Mississippi River. “Numbering nearly four billion, the tree was among the largest, tallest and fastest-growing in these forests,” according to the American Chestnut Foundation. “For thousands of years, the original inhabitants of the Appalachians coexisted with the American chestnut. The nuts provided an abundant food source, and Indigenous peoples responded in kind by managing the landscape to improve habitat for chestnuts.”

Charles Moreno, a New Hampshire forester who works with Exeter to help manage the 800-plus acre woodlands, explained to students Monday that symbiosis was upended in 1904 when a blight was discovered on chestnuts in a Bronx botanical garden. Introduced by the planting of a non-native Chinese variation of the chestnut, the blight devastated the native species. By 1950, the American chestnut was nearly gone.

Forester Charles Moreno speaks to Exeter students about the efforts to reintroduce the American chestnut tree decimated by blight.

Today, science has helped re-establish it through a hybrid seed — B3F3 — with genetic resistance established through multi-generations of cross-pollination in the lab. Three hundred of the B3F3 seedlings were donated to Exeter last year, and on Climate Action Day last year, students joined Moreno to plant them in designated places in the woodlands southeast of campus.

Monday’s mission: Check on their progress. While 300 soaring American chestnuts won’t result, Moreno is optimistic that many in this battalion of saplings will prevail. Students inspected the hundreds of plastic tubes that protect the tiny saplings, making sure winter and hungry voles haven’t wrought too much damage. The saplings that thrive will grow 4 to 7 feet per year. By the time the class of 2044 graduates, these trees could each be producing as much as 100 pounds of chestnuts annually.

One man’s trash …

In the workshop “Recycle + Reuse + Repurpose,” visiting artist Ryan McGinness gave two groups of students a glimpse into how he uses upcycled and sustainable materials in his artmaking process. From worn-out squeegees used to spread paint in the screenprinting process, to thrifted T-shirts printed with new designs, to saving old paint containers for future sculptures, McGinness said he is constantly finding ways to rework “residue and detritus from the studio” into new creations.

McGinness, a New York City-based artist whose work draws on the surf and skate culture of his native Virginia Beach, is known for paintings, screenprints and installations that incorporate corporate logos, signage and contemporary iconography. His work is held in the Museum of Modern Art in New York, The Museum of Contemporary Art in San Diego and the Charles Saatchi Collection, among other museums and art collections.

Aided by Art Department faculty members, McGinness guided students through the screenprinting process, helping them create a collaborative artwork on repurposed screens, using old ink, spatulas and squeegees. The project was inspired by McGinness’ own recycled installation, “Screen Combine #47.” After an initial demonstration, the 12 students in the afternoon workshop donned aprons and broke into pairs to build on the work of their morning counterparts, creating a rich, layered tapestry with a vibrant message of sustainability.

In addition to his Climate Action Day workshops, McGinness was to spend a week on campus thanks to the generosity of the Michael Clark Rockefeller ’56 Visiting Artists Fund. He will visit various art classes, and deliver a slide talk on Thursday, Apr. 25 at 8 p.m. in the Frederick R. Mayer Art Center.

Meeting people where they are

Speaking at an afternoon workshop in Assembly Hall, Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIMEdiscussed his work as a journalist covering climate change. 

In his early days on the climate beat, Worland noticed a hole in the storytelling surrounding the climate crisis. He realized most of the reporting was too scientific and not accessible to the average reader. Worland focused on telling the stories of commodities, like coffee, and what the effects of climate change can do to something tangible and beloved. “You have to meet people where they are,” he said. 

As a high-schooler, Worland’s interest, and that of his peers, in the topic climate change was admittedly low. Looking out at the Assembly Hall audience, Worland received a nearly unanimous response when asking, “How many of you are concerned about climate change?” He followed up by asking how many intend to pursue a life in climate advocacy, receiving a much more muted reaction. Worland championed former presidential candidate Tom Steyer’s ’75 message that people, regardless of their occupation, should strive to be “climate people.”

“One of the most remarkable things I’ve noticed in the course of the last decade is how much people are starting to think about climate beyond just the [traditional] climate people, how people are starting to incorporate findings that work across fields, even if isn’t their full-time job.”

The visiting fireman

J. Robert Oppenheimer stood on the Academy chapel stage, his prepared remarks to 700 boys and their teachers reaching the end of an hour.

“I am at the end of my time,” he said. “I may have spoken a little sadly; but I do not have the feeling this is bad news. I have the feeling that there is only one true danger, and that is to go into our life or through it without understanding what we are up against, what is asked of us, and by what we can reasonably be judged.”

With those words, Oppenheimer, “the father of the atomic bomb,” concluded his extraordinary visiting fellowship at Exeter in 1955.

Today, Oppenheimer is a household name, the result of an epic eponymous film whose nearly billion-dollar box office haul is a record for a biopic. Almost 80 years ago, he was known worldwide as the brilliant physicist behind the Manhattan Project who played a pivotal role in developing the atomic weapons that ultimately ended World War II. His leadership of the Los Alamos lab in New Mexico, where the work was conducted, earned him global celebrity and influence.

But Oppenheimer was more infamous than famous when Exeter invited him to be its first “visiting fireman.” His old acquaintances and unpopular views on nuclear proliferation had turned an unforgiving spotlight on Oppenheimer in the years after the war. The fallout stained his legacy and largely cost him his career.

How he wound up at Exeter, how he spent his week on campus, and the waves his visit created are preserved in letters and newspaper and magazine clippings in the Library of Congress — and in the memories of those Exonians fortunate enough to be enrolled in the fall of 1955.

The nuclear age

The world changed greatly during the decade after the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. An “iron curtain” of Soviet control fell across Eastern Europe. A three-year war on the Korean Peninsula between communist and pro-democracy forces resulted in stalemate and cost more than 35,000 American lives. A nuclear arms race was on, with the development of the atomic bomb giving way to pursuit of the thermonuclear hydrogen bomb — a weapon a thousand times more powerful than the one that flattened Hiroshima. And in hearing rooms in the U.S. Senate and in the editorial pages of American newspapers, attempts to thwart communism blossomed into a full-blown “red scare” that infected everyday life.

The race for nuclear supremacy and heightened fears about the spread of communism led to Oppenheimer’s undoing.

As the nation’s foremost scientist, and a leading voice in the fledgling Atomic Energy Commission, Oppenheimer was against expanding the nation’s nuclear arsenal. He lobbied to end research into the hydrogen bomb — then referred to as the “Super” — and urged international oversight of nuclear weapons. Those views placed him afoul of hawks in Congress and U.S. military leadership, as well as President Harry Truman, who rejected Oppenheimer’s advice. They also led the FBI to reopen an Oppenheimer file that was started before the war because of his friendships with and connections to communists in academia.

In late 1953, an aide on the congressional committee overseeing nuclear arms sent a letter to the FBI claiming that “more probably than not, J. Robert Oppenheimer is an agent of the Soviet Union.” The resulting uproar prompted the government to conduct a security investigation into Oppenheimer. On June 1, 1954, after 19 days of closed testimony, the inquiry found that Oppenheimer was in fact loyal to his country but that his testimony in the hearings had been “less than candid” and that his views against developing the hydrogen bomb “had an adverse effect on recruitment of scientists and the progress of the scientific effort.”

The board voted to revoke Oppenheimer’s security clearance, denying him access to the nation’s nuclear research and secrets, and effectively ending his influence on the matter. The father of the atomic bomb, a hero of American science, was relegated to exile in academia.

That’s where the Principal’s Visiting Fellows Committee and one of its members, Michael Tennican ’56, found him in 1955.

Inviting discourse

The idea of embedding a VIP — a “visiting fireman” in popular parlance — at Exeter belonged to the editorial board of The Exonian. The students pitched the program to Principal William Saltonstall in 1954. “Under the Visiting Fellows Plan,” the newspaper reported, “noted figures in fields such as history, literature, and the arts would spend from one to two weeks or perhaps more at PEA, giving lectures, visiting classes and most important, talking informally with boys.”

The choice of Oppenheimer was ambitious to say the least. He had made few public appearances after his security clearance was revoked. Only a month before Exeter’s invitation, the president of the University of Washington canceled a plan for Oppenheimer to deliver a series of lectures there. The resulting upheaval led the state of Washington to outlaw the Communist Party and require all government employees to take a loyalty oath.

“The committee as a whole was very much aware of the controversy surrounding Oppenheimer’s public stance and considered whether that controversy counseled against inviting him to Exeter,” Tennican recalls. “I think that all of us concluded that his cautions against nuclear weapons were well worth consideration and that Exeter students were plenty strong enough to weigh his arguments against contrary views, however loud.”

Saltonstall extended the formal invitation to Oppenheimer in a letter dated March 11, 1955: “For some time now, we have been discussing the possibility of inviting to the school for a week or two a Visiting Fellow. We already have many guest speakers during the year, but in every case, they come, deliver their speeches, and in a day or two are on their way again.

“It is the very strong desire of our students and faculty that we try to persuade one or two people a year to stay for a longer period of time in order that men and boys will have more of an opportunity to talk with them without a feeling of pressure. … Is it possible that you would be able to come to Exeter sometime this spring as the first Visiting Fellow?”

A month passed before Oppenheimer replied. “Dear Mr. Saltonstall. Thank you for your good letter of March 11th. I am delighted by your plan … and touched and grateful that you should have invited me. … I should like very much to accept.”

Crowded schedules led the visit to be delayed until the following fall, when it was decided that a week in mid-November worked best. In the days ahead of Oppenheimer’s arrival, Saltonstall suggested a “flexible” itinerary that included “meetings with mathematics and scientific societies, the board of the school paper and perhaps one or two of the other student organizations; discussions with faculty in the Math, Science and History departments”; and a closing address “to the boys and the faculty and their wives.”

On Nov. 16, 1955, J. Robert Oppenheimer arrived at Exeter.

Memorable conversations

The visit surpassed Saltonstall’s hopes. “For six days he answered questions in the school’s Lamont Art Gallery,” Newsweek reported. “He was mercilessly grilled about everything from segregation to religion and science, from the Geneva Conference to how to get rid of communists in Tibet.”

The Exonian reported that Oppenheimer spent eight hours a day speaking with students and teachers: “Friday was a typical day. In the morning, the doctor, after having met with the Science Department, held discussions with four science sections. He ate lunch with eight or 10 of the leading science students. After talking with boys for most of the afternoon on the balcony of the Art Gallery, Dr. Oppenheimer had dinner with some of the faculty.”

Ben Page ’58 recalls being among a half-dozen chemistry and physics students who met informally with the scientist. “Oppenheimer was probably the smartest person I have ever encountered, in a lifetime of meeting many smart and interesting people,” says Page, now an emeritus professor at Northwestern University.

The week culminated with Oppenheimer’s remarks to the entire Exeter community on a Monday evening in chapel, the informal name then used for both the physical space in which the community gathered in the Academy Building as well as the gatherings themselves. The speech, by all accounts, was stirring. He wished for every student in attendance “to look into some area of science you do not understand, to have a sense of impotence and darkness about it, to find your way gradually into seeing what it is really all about, of seeing how it ties up with things you have known before, to see its order and its beauty. It is something that you will never forget.”

He told listeners that science is one of the “great testaments to man’s power and his reason, but it is always aware of its limits. He who practices it ought always to be aware that its powers, though great, are limited, that he is not like God, but that he is something special in his own right.”

Oppenheimer pondered aloud what Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin would think of the unfathomable strides science had made in the previous 200 years, saying, “They would have been overwhelmed by what the application of science has done to man’s life, by the extent to which it has lengthened his life, made it possible to alleviate and cope with his pain and his trouble, made it possible to extend his powers, made power itself really quite abundant.”

Then he came to the heart of his remarks: three “rather troublesome points” that science had wrought.

First, he said, “science has given us the power to do a lot of things that we should not. … the exercise of this power will produce evil; the exercise of that power is disaster.”

Second, Oppenheimer said, science and politics had diverged in ways Jefferson and Franklin could not have imagined: “Because of the complexity of technical things, competence and expertness are vested in people who have not and probably should not have the authority; and people in authority are ignorant — and not always adequately aware of how ignorant — of the very technical things on which their decisions have to rest.”

Third, he said, he regretted the effect of the complexity and specialization of scientific study: “Men in one field get deep into it, devote their life to it, love it, make maybe some great discoveries in it — and really not know too much of what is going on in another.” The more we learn, the less we may know, in other words.

“I think these changes are here to stay,” he said, “because I cannot imagine anything other than a disaster that will stop the accumulation of knowledge.”

The fallout

Oppenheimer’s address received the highest marks from the students. “His speech was undoubtedly the most thought-provoking and comprehensive that has been given, and perhaps that will be given, during this year,” The Exonian reported.

“Spectacular,” Page recalls.

William “Bo” Wreden ’58 says, “The following day I wrote to my parents, first about my grades and about Thanksgiving plans and then about my impressions” of the address. He wrote, “Oppenheimer gave an excellent speech in Chapel on Monday which had the most applause I have ever heard given to a speaker (and some speakers get an aweful [sic] lot here).”

Saltonstall summarized Oppenheimer’s residency for the Boston Sunday Herald: “His enthusiasm and understanding have been a special joy to me. I’ve been happy with the whole thing.”

Others were less enamored, namely William Loeb III, the publisher of the Manchester Union Leader. He held outsize influence as a conservative kingmaker because of New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation presidential primary every four years. Loeb called Oppenheimer’s appearance “revolting” in an editorial published three days later. Citing the revocation of the scientist’s security clearance and his “friendship with Reds,” Loeb said it was “gross negligence” on the part of Academy leaders to allow “Oppenheimer to ‘stimulate the minds of the students.’ It is worse than that. It is an instance of glaring arrogance and of utter disregard of proprieties, patriotic and otherwise.”

The editorial prompted some letters to Saltonstall condemning the invitation. It also drew stinging retorts from students who wrote letters to the editor of the Union Leader. “If I were you, I should not worry about another’s disregard for patriotic proprieties, but about my own abuse of those liberties which we Americans so dearly cherish in this land of freedom,” wrote C. Bradley Moore ’57.

The students’ letters only further agitated Loeb. He followed with a series of editorials bearing headlines like “Mis-Education at Exeter” and “Arrogance and Illogic at Exeter,” writing “how completely these naïve young men have been taken in by Oppenheimer can be best judged from those letters.”

In a letter to Saltonstall, Oppenheimer lamented the war of words. “I have seen some of the attacks made upon Exeter for inviting me,” he wrote. “I hope they have brought you no serious trouble.”

A Christmas card Katharyn Saltonstall sent to Oppenheimer perhaps best summarized the feelings of her husband and the Exeter community. “What a rich harvest of ideas and sober thoughts your week’s visit provoked and inspired among the boys, the faculty and all of us who were privileged to meet and talk with you,” she wrote. “I remember nothing that has had quite the same impact and influence for good on the community in all the 25 years we have been at Exeter.”

Valued perspective

More visiting fellows followed Oppenheimer through the program, including Pulitzer Prize winners Ralph McGill and Mark Van Doren. In 1969, Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall spent two days in Exeter. To this day, Exeter benefits from a rich and diverse roster of distinguished visiting speakers and thinkers.

As for Oppenheimer, he was director of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton from 1947 to 1966. At the time of his death in 1967, the world’s nuclear cache had reached a peak of more than 31,000 warheads.

Last year, the Biden administration reversed the 1954 decision to revoke Oppenheimer’s security clearance. The Atomic Energy Commission’s investigation was a “flawed process that violated the Commission’s own regulations,” Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm said in a news release. “As time has passed, more evidence has come to light of the bias and unfairness of the process that Dr. Oppenheimer was subjected to while the evidence of his loyalty and love of country have only been further affirmed.”